Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
Right arrow J58 - Public Policy
Right arrow J68 - Public Policy
Right arrow O33 - Technological Change: Choices and [...]
Right arrow O47 - Measurement of Economic Growth; [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Socio-Economic Review 2:1-32 (2004)
© 2004 Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics

New growth regimes, but still institutional diversity

Robert Boyer

CEPREMAP, CNRS, EHESS, 48 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France

Correspondence: robert.boyer{at}cepremap.cnrs.fr

Whereas the American case may hint that product and labour market deregulation, venture capital and NASDAQ are necessary for the success of technologically led growth, international comparison suggests the coexistence of at least three successful configurations. Deregulated economies explore a science-pushed innovation, along with external labour flexibility and significant inequality in terms of competences. However, social democratic countries develop a cooperative approach to the knowledge-based economy: rather homogeneous educational level, lifelong learning, negotiation by social partners of the consequence of innovation and collectively organized labour mobility. There is a third configuration for some catching-up economies that use information technology as a method of leapfrogging: labour markets remain largely institutionalized and regulated, without exerting adverse impact upon macroeconomic performance.

Key Words: ICT • knowledge based economy • comparative growth analysis • institutional complementarity • brand of capitalism • the new economy • JEL classification: G14 information and market efficiency; event studies, O33 technological change: choices and consequences, O47 measurement of economic growth; aggregate productivity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.