Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B13 - Neoclassical through 1925
Right arrow B25 - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Socio-Economic Review 2:87-108 (2004)
© 2004 Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics

The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety?

Matthew Allen

Institute for German Studies, European Research Institute, Birmingham University, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Correspondence: m.m.allen{at}bham.co.uk

This paper attempts to shed light on some of the unstated assumptions of the varieties of capitalism framework by comparing it with its ‘close relative’—that is, transaction cost economics—as well as neoclassical economics. These comparisons show that, within the varieties of capitalism approach, actors' strategic preferences are assumed to be endogenous to the institutional environment in which they operate. Moreover, important institutions are assumed to be uniformly spread across firms within a national economy. This latter presupposition ultimately makes the varieties of capitalism framework a structuralist approach. Despite its claims to the contrary that it is an actor-centred approach, the varieties of firms paradigm treats the varieties of firms as irrelevant. It is this variety that is lacking in the approach, and that needs to be addressed in any empirical assessments of it.

Key Words: varieties of capitalism • transaction cost economics • institutions: collective agreements • works councils • Germany • JEL classification: B25 institutional economic thought, B13 neoclassical economic thought, D23 organizational behaviour; transaction costs; property rights


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.