Skip Navigation

Socio-Economic Review 2004 2(3):341-370; doi:10.1093/soceco/2.3.341
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Djelic, M.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow N44 - Europe: 1913-
Right arrow P51 - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems
Right arrow L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Age, Profit, and Sales
Right arrow O33 - Technological Change: Choices and [...]
Right arrow Z13 - Social Norms and Social Capital; Social Networks
Right arrow N74 - Europe: 1913-
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics 2004. All rights reserved.

Social networks and country-to-country transfer: dense and weak ties in the diffusion of knowledge

Marie-Laure Djelic*

ESSEC Business School, France

Correspondence: djelic{at}essec.fr

This article investigates the social network dimension in processes of cross-national transfer. The empirical focus is the conscious attempt to appropriate, in France after 1945, the American model of the large firm. Structural conditions—internal crisis and geopolitical dependence—created the context in which country-to-country transfer could take place. Our findings also show, however, that the transfer itself required the activation of concrete mechanisms and, there, social networks proved key. Our evidence shows in fact the tight and reciprocal interaction, the co-construction, as it were, of social networks on the one hand and processes of institutionalization on the other. Building upon our empirical findings, we propose furthermore that successful cross-national transfer hinges on a particular kind of network structure. In the story recounted here diffusion across national borders called for the smooth and successful articulation of two types of social networks—a cross-national "weak ties" network and national "strong ties" ones. In the end, this article accords with the current calls for cross-fertilization of institutional theory and social network theory. And we argue that both approaches are useful and complementary when dealing with country-to-country transfers.

Key Words: social networks • transnational diffusion • economic modernization • structural change • Americanization • JEL classification: N44 government; war; law and regulation (Europe:1913–), P51 comparative analysis of economic systems, L25 firm objectives; organization and behaviour (firm size and performance), O33 technological change, research and development (diffusion processes), Z13 social norms and social capital


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.