Skip Navigation

Socio-Economic Review 2005 3(2):233-258; doi:10.1093/SER/mwi010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polavieja, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
Right arrow J41 - Labor Contracts
Right arrow J42 - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets
Right arrow J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Flexibility or polarization? Temporary employment and job tasks in Spain

Javier G. Polavieja

Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Department of Political and Social Sciences, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence: Javier G. Polavieja, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Department of Political and Social Sciences, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25–27, Barcelona 08005, Spain. E-mail: javier.polavieja{at}upf.edu

The paper takes issue with demand-based interpretations of the consequences of deregulation through temporary employment in Spain. According to demand-based accounts, the introduction of temporary contracts has helped to generate and maintain a secondary segment in the Spanish labour market, in which specific product market conditions generate a need for highly flexible contracts to perform low-skilled tasks. In contrast to this view, the paper argues that partial deregulation has also had important segmenting consequences amongst Spanish professionals, despite the high levels of asset specificity and monitoring costs involved in their job tasks. Drawing on the analysis of the Spanish Labour Force Survey for the period 1987–1997, the paper presents empirical evidence that shows how, when introduced in a context of high unemployment and high dismissal costs for the permanent workforce, temporary contracts can generate a process of polarization of employment chances within both manual and professional occupations. The segmenting consequences of partial deregulation have, therefore, been more severe, pervasive and pernicious than it is acknowledged by demand-based accounts.

Key Words: Temporary employment • segmentation • occupational classes • Spain • JEL classification: J21 Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure; J41 Contracts: Specific Human Capital, Matching Models, Efficiency Wage Models, and Internal Labor Markets; J42 Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.