Skip Navigation

Socio-Economic Review 2005 3(3):559-567; doi:10.1093/SER/mwi024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrigel, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Institutionalists at the limits of institutionalism: a constructivist critique of two edited volumes from Wolfgang Streeck and Kozo Yamamura

Gary Herrigel

Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, 5828 S. University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Correspondence: E-mail: g-herrigel{at}uchicago.edu

The two books under review are terrific and amount, essentially, to benchmarks for any future scholarship on adjustment in Germany and Japan (especially in Germany). In what follows, I will briefly praise and then, in a more extended manner, criticize the volumes and the perspective on change in Germany and Japan that they embody. But the praise is genuine and should not be lost in the disproportionate space devoted to critique in this contribution.

Key Words: Germany • Japan • economic change • institutionalism


1 For additional examples of how these alternative traditions are informing reform experiments in Germany, see Herrigel and Wittke 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.