Skip Navigation


Socio-Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on October 18, 2005
Socio-Economic Review 2006 4(1):1-33; doi:10.1093/SER/mwj029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/1/1    most recent
mwj029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
Right arrow J40 - General
Right arrow J65 - Unemployment Insurance; Severance [...]
Right arrow J69 - Other
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Social risk management through transitional labour markets

Günther Schmid

Director of the ‘Labour Market Policy and Employment’ Research Unit, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) and Professor of Political Economy, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence: Günther Schmid, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: gues{at}wz-berlin.de

This essay takes the intrusion of the term ‘risk management’ into the social policy discourse as a ‘moral opportunity’ to reconsider the balance between solidarity and individual responsibility. The argument is developed in three stages: first, the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices provides evidence of the bounded rationality of risky choices. The paper demonstrates how the institutionalization of opportunity structures recommended by the concept of transitional labour markets can overcome various kinds of asymmetries in risk perception. Second, imperfect or strategic information may also cause biased risk perception. Examples, therefore, are provided of how the analysis of labour market transitions throughout the life course can considerably improve the methodology of risk management. Third, the consideration of risk asymmetries and the reduction of information deficits do not yet provide any starting point for constructing acceptable risk sharing institutions. Normative principles of justice therefore have to be reconsidered. It is suggested that Rawls' theory of justice should be enriched by Dworkin's ethical theory and Sen's capability approach.

Key Words: risk management • rational choice • prospect theory • justice theory • labour market • social policy • JEL classification: A130 relation of economics to social value, J400 particular labour markets, general, J650 unemployment insurance, J690 other (transitional labour markets)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.