Skip Navigation


Socio-Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on October 26, 2005
Socio-Economic Review 2006 4(1):139-153; doi:10.1093/SER/mwj036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/1/139    most recent
mwj036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J41 - Contracts: Specific Human Capital, [...]
Right arrow K12 - Contract Law
Right arrow K31 - Labor Law
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Flexibility and stability of expectations in the contract of employment

Hugh Collins

Professor of English Law, London School of Economics, London, UK

Correspondence: h.collins{at}lse.ac.uk

The law stabilizes transactional relations by protecting the implicit expectations of the parties to contracts by various techniques including the imposition of mandatory and supplementary rules. The established pattern in the contract of employment of the protection of expectations of co-operation from the employee and fair treatment by the employer has come under strain as a consequence of the employer's increasing expectations of functional flexibility and entrepreneurial activity on the part of the employee. In order to protect these new expectations with regard to the indeterminacy and impermanence of employment, communication and consultation, and incentive-based payment systems, legal systems need to evolve new normative standards that can articulate and stabilize these new forms of employment relations. Using the model of symbiotic contracts as a paradigm, the essay explores what normative standards and regulatory techniques will be appropriate to stabilize and protect new flexible employment relations. The primary objective of this regulation is to secure fair treatment for employees so that they will be willing to co-operate with new flexible forms of employment, which in turn should promote competitiveness.

Key Words: contract • employment • flexibility • symbiotic contract • JEL classification: J41, K12, K31


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.