Skip Navigation


Socio-Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2006
Socio-Economic Review 2006 4(3):379-416; doi:10.1093/ser/mwl001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/3/379    most recent
mwl001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kalev, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow M52 - Compensation and Compensation Methods [...]
Right arrow M54 - Labor Management [...]
Right arrow K31 - Labor Law
Right arrow J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Managing flexible work arrangements in US organizations: formalized discretion or ‘a right to ask’

Erin L. Kelly1 and Alexandra Kalev2

1 Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA and 2 The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Scholars in Health Policy Research Program, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

Correspondence: Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, 909 Social Sciences, 267 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. E-mail: kelly101{at}umn.edu

Scholars of the American workplace agree that the employment relationship has changed in significant ways but disagree about whether workplaces are now best characterized as ‘legalized’ or ‘restructured’, a designation that implies a market orientation in the treatment of workers. We investigate whether a new set of employment practices, namely flexible work arrangements (FWA) such as flextime, compressed work weeks, telecommuting and reduced-hours schedules, are administered using the principles and practices associated with either or both management regimes. Our analyses of in-depth interviews with human resources managers from 41 diverse organizations show that most organizations have formalized FWA with written policies, but these policies institutionalize managerial discretion rather than creating outright rights for employees. Even when organizations write a formal written policy, FWA are managed as negotiated perks available to valued workers if and when managers choose to allow them, as suggested by the restructured workplace regime. We argue that this ‘formalized discretion’ explains the low utilization and unequal access to FWA found in previous studies. These findings suggest the need to reconsider the theoretical link between formalization and employees' rights in the workplace.

Key Words: flexible work arrangements • formalization • legalization • restructuring • human resources • working hours • part-time employment • JEL classification: M52 compensation and compensation methods, M54 labor management, K31 labor law


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.