Skip Navigation


Socio-Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on May 18, 2006
Socio-Economic Review 2007 5(1):3-45; doi:10.1093/ser/mwl016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/1/3    most recent
mwl016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow P16 - Political Economy
Right arrow B13 - Neoclassical through 1925
Right arrow B15 - Historical; Institutional
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The institutional economics of John R. Commons: complement and substitute for neoclassical economic theory

Bruce E. Kaufman

Department of Economics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA

Correspondence: bkaufman{at}gsu.edu

In this paper I outline the theory of institutional economics developed by John R. Commons and contrast it with neoclassical economic theory. Key concepts in Commons' theory are bounded rationality, property rights, working rules, institutions, transactions and incomplete contracts. Although Commons' writings tend toward the obscure and descriptive, I demonstrate that on a deeper level of analysis his ideas and concepts provide the basis for an alternative body of economic theory. In certain respects, this body of theory complements neoclassical theory by fleshing-out the institutional infrastructure that governs and regulates market exchange. In other respects, however, Commons' theory of institutional economics is a heterodox substitute for neoclassical theory because it is built using a different methodology, replaces or modifies central theoretical pillars of neoclassical theory, and denies the validity of the ‘Invisible Hand’ theorem and other core neoclassical propositions. Commons' institutional economics also provides a theoretical framework for an integration of the economic and social dimensions of human behaviour.

Key Words: John R. Commons • institutional economics • transaction costs • property rights • heterodox economics • socio-economics • JEL classification: B13 history of economic thought through 1925, neoclassical, B15 historical, institutional, D23 production and organizations, organizational behavior, transaction costs, property rights, P16 capitalist systems, political economy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.