Skip Navigation



Socio-Economic Review Advance Access published online on August 21, 2008

Socio-Economic Review, doi:10.1093/ser/mwn014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
6/4/671    most recent
mwn014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bandelj, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Economic objects as cultural objects: discourse on foreign investment in post-socialist Europe

Nina Bandelj

Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

Correspondence: nbandelj{at}uci.edu

Bringing together perspectives from economic sociology and cultural sociology, this paper proposes that because economic phenomena are imbued with meaning they can be studied as cultural objects. This approach includes first identifying the content of people's understanding of economic phenomena and then tracing out what is it that structures their interpretations. The paper applies the cultural objects analysis to the public debates surrounding foreign investment in post-socialist Slovenia. Actors interpret economic phenomena so they can provide justifications for the positions they adopt in public debates and assess possible strategies of action. The content analysis of newspaper texts shows that foreign globalization pressures are mostly framed in a binary relation to national interests. But because economic consequences are uncertain, the particular understandings of how foreign investment affects national interests are multiple, even contradictory. They are shaped by the social identities of actors and historical and macro-structural conditions of post-socialism that make salient different, often contradictory, institutional orders.

Key Words: culture • economic sociology • globalization • transitional economies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.