Skip Navigation

Socio-Economic Review 2005 3(1):133-152; doi:10.1093/SER/mwi004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
Right arrow D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other [...]
Right arrow D64 - Altruism
Right arrow D74 - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics 2005. All rights reserved.

Making things happen: the responsibility of negotiation

Mark Young

Humboldt University Berlin, Mommsenstr 26, 10629 Berlin

Correspondence: Markyoung{at}aol.com

Philosophical analysis can indeed have a practical impact on public policy. It is not only in the fields of ethics or decision theory that interdisciplinary approaches have proven to be fruitful, but also in the growing new discipline of conflict resolution. Using the anecdotal example of the Ten Point Coalition in Boston, this paper proposes a new ‘philosophical’ approach to conflict resolution. It starts with the realization that negotiation results are created jointly by the parties involved, and are therefore not easily predictable by external observers. It outlines a process whereby negotiators can work together in open conversation to establish reasons for action rather than seeking causes of results, thereby also taking on an ethical responsibility to jointly create a ‘story’, which can lead to hitherto unexpected solutions and, at the same time, also do justice to the ethical dimension of conflict resolution.

Key Words: negotiation • mediation • JEL classification: A13, D63, D64, D74


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.