Skip Navigation


Socio-Economic Review Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2006
Socio-Economic Review 2007 5(1):47-80; doi:10.1093/ser/mwl006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/1/47    most recent
mwl006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneiberg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L30 - General
Right arrow P10 - General
Right arrow P13 - Cooperative Enterprises
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950

Marc Schneiberg

Department of Sociology, Reed College, OR, USA

Correspondence: Marc Schneiberg, Department of Sociology, Reed College, 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd, Portland, OR 97202, USA. E-mail: marc.schneiberg{at}reed.edu

Institutionalists commonly invoke exogenous shocks or the transposition of logics across national systems to explain institutional change and new path creation. Using organizational data on American infrastructure industries, this paper shows instead how established institutional paths contain within them possibilities and resources for transformation and off-path organization. Even settled paths are typically littered with flotsam and jetsam—with elements of alternative economic orders and abandoned or partly realized institutional projects. These elements of ‘paths not taken’ are legacies of constitutional struggles and movements for alternative forms of order whose settlement or defeat help fix the path that triumphed. Moreover, they represent resources for endogenous institutional change, including the revival, reassembly, redeployment and subsequent elaboration of alternative logics within national capitalisms. As the analysis of the US case shows, such legacies underwrote the construction of an entirely different, cooperatively organized path alongside the dominant path of impersonal markets and for-profit corporations. Taken together, these findings generate new leverage for explaining institutional change. They also highlight features of the US case that have been ignored by institutionalist and ‘varieties of capitalism’ research, including internal structural variety, endogenous change processes, and the co-evolution of cooperative or coordinated and liberal market economies within American capitalism.

Key Words: capitalism • institutional change • path dependence • cooperatives • varieties of capitalism • JEL classifications: P1 capitalist systems, P13 cooperative enterprises, L3 non-profit organizations and public enterprise


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.