Skip Navigation

Socio-Economic Review 2007 5(2):319-367; doi:10.1093/ser/mwl031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swedberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Burawoy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow A14 - Sociology of Economics
Right arrow Z13 - Social Norms and Social Capital; Social Networks
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Economic sociology as public sociology

JEL classification: A14 sociology of economics

Key Words: economic sociology • markets


 

Public sociology and economic sociology: introductory remarks

Richard Swedberg

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Correspondence: rs328{at}cornell.edu


 

Confronting Market Fundamentalism: doing ‘Public Economic Sociology’

Fred Block

Department of Sociology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

Correspondence: flblock{at}ucdavis.edu

This essay argues that Market Fundamentalism—a vastly exaggerated belief in the ability of self regulating markets to solve problems—has become hegemonic in the USA. While it is urgent that sociologists challenge these ideas, they are unlikely to be effective if they confine their efforts to writing articles and books. It is necessary to think strategically and work in concert with political allies to wage campaigns that will challenge Market Fundamentalism directly. The example of a campaign to strengthen the position of employees in the hotel and convention industry is used to suggest the kinds of alliances that are necessary.


 

The invisible science of the invisible hand: the public presence of economic sociology in the USA

Akos Rona-Tas and Nadav Gabay

University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

Correspondence: aronatas{at}ucsd.edu

In the USA, the public visibility of economic sociology (ES) has been abysmal, especially in contrast to economics. We start with two case studies where economists borrowed ideas from sociologists, executed them at not particularly high levels and still received great publicity. Once we established that economics gets better press even with less original and overall weaker scholarship, we bracket issues of content and proceed to observe other, institutional mechanisms that privilege economists. As economic sociologists receive less notice because they are sociologists and not economists, we analyse the wider discipline of sociology. We find that sociology is more fragmented both as a discipline and as a profession, it has lost many of its outside constituencies by the 1980s, has not developed a mediating layer of journalists, works on a longer time-scale, and has had mixed success in education. We conclude with recommendations how ES can increase its profile in the USA.


 

Public sociology vs. the market1

Michael Burawoy

University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

Correspondence: burawoy{at}berkeley.edu

Building on Karl Polanyi's theory of a societal reaction to the unregulated exchange of what he called fictitious commodities—labour, money and land—this paper links the history of sociology to the history of the market. If the first wave of marketization in the nineteenth century dwelt on the commodification of labour, prompting utopian sociologies, and the second wave of marketization of the twentieth century was provoked by the commodification of money, generating national policy sociologies, then the third wave of marketization that began in the last quarter of the twentieth century includes the commodification of the environment (land, air, water), and calls for public sociologies of a global dimension.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.