Skip Navigation



Socio-Economic Review Advance Access published online on October 18, 2005
Socio-Economic Review, doi:10.1093/SER/mwj029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/1/1    most recent
mwj029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Social risk management through transitional labour markets

Günther Schmid 1*

1 Director of the ‘Labour Market Policy and Employment’ Research Unit, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) and Professor of Political Economy, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Günther Schmid, E-mail: gues{at}wz-berlin.de


  Abstract

This essay takes the intrusion of the term ‘risk management’ into the social policy discourse as a ‘moral opportunity’ to reconsider the balance between solidarity and individual responsibility. The argument is developed in three stages: first, the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices provides evidence of the bounded rationality of risky choices. The paper demonstrates how the institutionalization of opportunity structures recommended by the concept of transitional labour markets can overcome various kinds of asymmetries in risk perception. Second, imperfect or strategic information may also cause biased risk perception. Examples, therefore, are provided of how the analysis of labour market transitions throughout the life course can considerably improve the methodology of risk management. Third, the consideration of risk asymmetries and the reduction of information deficits do not yet provide any starting point for constructing acceptable risk sharing institutions. Normative principles of justice therefore have to be reconsidered. It is suggested that Rawls' theory of justice should be enriched by Dworkin's ethical theory and Sen's capability approach.

Keywords: risk management; rational choice; prospect theory; justice theory; labour market; social policy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.